Estill
Estill is absent from the 2024 data, which means fewer than five births. Its best rank was 945th, in 1883.
- Rank in 2024
- —fewer than 5 births
- Births in 2024
- 0not in the data
- Peak year
- 191943 births
- Best rank
- #945in 1883
- Since 1883
- 1,246people given the name
The story in the numbers
1,246 boys have been named Estill in the United States since 1883, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 1919, with 43 births.
The name has all but left use: none recorded in 2024, against 43 at the peak.
Half of everyone given the name was born by 1931, and the 1920s alone account for 22%. It has spent 3 of 145 years in the top 1,000.
Rank among boys, year by year
By decade
| Decade | boys named Estill | |
|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | |
| 1890s | 11 | |
| 1900s | 41 | |
| 1910s | 258 | |
| 1920s | 280 | |
| 1930s | 197 | |
| 1940s | 176 | |
| 1950s | 104 | |
| 1960s | 98 | |
| 1970s | 59 | |
| 1980s | 12 | |
| 1990s | 5 |
In 1919, its biggest year
Estill was outside the top 1,000 that year. The top five boys’ names of 1919 were John, William, James, Robert and Charles. See all of 1919.
Names that rose and fell with Estill
Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.
- Arvelpeak 1921
- Milburnpeak 1918
- Odispeak 1921
- Durwardpeak 1916
- Estelpeak 1921
- Cletuspeak 1922
- Bufordpeak 1921
- Foypeak 1921
What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.