Ewell
Ewell is absent from the 2024 data, which means fewer than five births. Its best rank was 670th, in 1903.
- Rank in 2024
- —fewer than 5 births
- Births in 2024
- 0not in the data
- Peak year
- 191971 births
- Best rank
- #670in 1903
- Since 1882
- 2,051people given the name
The story in the numbers
2,051 boys have been named Ewell in the United States since 1882, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 1919, with 71 births.
The name has all but left use: none recorded in 2024, against 71 at the peak.
Half of everyone given the name was born by 1928, and the 1920s alone account for 25%. It has spent 37 of 145 years in the top 1,000.
Rank among boys, year by year
By decade
| Decade | boys named Ewell | |
|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 35 | |
| 1890s | 58 | |
| 1900s | 99 | |
| 1910s | 386 | |
| 1920s | 521 | |
| 1930s | 348 | |
| 1940s | 235 | |
| 1950s | 180 | |
| 1960s | 114 | |
| 1970s | 60 | |
| 1980s | 15 |
In 1919, its biggest year
Ewell was the 767th most given boy’s name that year. The top five boys’ names of 1919 were John, William, James, Robert and Charles. See all of 1919.
Names that rose and fell with Ewell
Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.
- Herschelpeak 1921
- Lesterpeak 1918
- Johniepeak 1920
- Vesterpeak 1922
- Floydpeak 1926
- Alviepeak 1921
- Ottispeak 1920
- Orvillepeak 1920
What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.