Margrett
Margrett is absent from the 2024 data, which means fewer than five births. Its best rank was 778th, in 1888.
- Rank in 2024
- —fewer than 5 births
- Births in 2024
- 0not in the data
- Peak year
- 192446 births
- Best rank
- #778in 1888
- Since 1885
- 1,371people given the name
The story in the numbers
1,371 girls have been named Margrett in the United States since 1885, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 1924, with 46 births.
The name has all but left use: none recorded in 2024, against 46 at the peak.
Half of everyone given the name was born by 1929, and the 1920s alone account for 25%. It has spent 2 of 145 years in the top 1,000.
Rank among girls, year by year
By decade
| Decade | girls named Margrett | |
|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 19 | |
| 1890s | 70 | |
| 1900s | 86 | |
| 1910s | 201 | |
| 1920s | 339 | |
| 1930s | 227 | |
| 1940s | 224 | |
| 1950s | 111 | |
| 1960s | 60 | |
| 1970s | 18 | |
| 1980s | 6 | |
| 1990s | 10 |
In 1924, its biggest year
Margrett was outside the top 1,000 that year. The top five girls’ names of 1924 were Mary, Dorothy, Helen, Betty and Margaret. See all of 1924.
Names that rose and fell with Margrett
Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.
- Virgiapeak 1919
- Evelenapeak 1924
- Verniapeak 1917
- Vernapeak 1918
- Fredapeak 1918
- Vertapeak 1922
- Nevapeak 1920
- Naomapeak 1924
Other spellings in the data
What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.