Raynell
Raynell is absent from the 2024 data, which means fewer than five births. It has never entered the top 1,000.
- Rank in 2024
- —fewer than 5 births
- Births in 2024
- 0not in the data
- Peak year
- 195619 births
- Best rank
- —never in the top 1,000
- Since 1925
- 1,154people given the name
The story in the numbers
716 girls have been named Raynell in the United States since 1925, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 1956, with 19 births.
The name has all but left use: none recorded in 2024, against 19 at the peak.
Half of everyone given the name was born by 1966, and the 1960s alone account for 18%.
Raynell is used for both sexes: 38% of its bearers are boys (438), most of them born around 1976.
By decade
In 1956, its biggest year
Raynell was outside the top 1,000 that year. The top five girls’ names of 1956 were Mary, Debra, Linda, Deborah and Susan. See all of 1956.
Names that rose and fell with Raynell
Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.
- Jacqulynpeak 1952
- Jannettepeak 1960
- Jacquelynpeak 1951
- Jacquelinepeak 1964
- Janitapeak 1963
- Charmainepeak 1952
- Lenitapeak 1960
- Charlynpeak 1947
What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.