Reatha
Reatha is absent from the 2024 data, which means fewer than five births. Its best rank was 874th, in 1910.
- Rank in 2024
- —fewer than 5 births
- Births in 2024
- 0not in the data
- Peak year
- 192772 births
- Best rank
- #874in 1910
- Since 1893
- 2,624people given the name
The story in the numbers
2,624 girls have been named Reatha in the United States since 1893, according to Social Security records. The busiest single year was 1927, with 72 births.
The name has all but left use: none recorded in 2024, against 72 at the peak.
Half of everyone given the name was born by 1934, and the 1920s alone account for 22%. It has spent 13 of 145 years in the top 1,000.
Rank among girls, year by year
By decade
| Decade | girls named Reatha | |
|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 23 | |
| 1900s | 131 | |
| 1910s | 376 | |
| 1920s | 587 | |
| 1930s | 441 | |
| 1940s | 422 | |
| 1950s | 394 | |
| 1960s | 184 | |
| 1970s | 51 | |
| 1980s | 10 | |
| 1990s | 5 |
In 1927, its biggest year
Reatha was the 882nd most given girl’s name that year. The top five girls’ names of 1927 were Mary, Dorothy, Betty, Helen and Margaret. See all of 1927.
Names that rose and fell with Reatha
Same sex, most similar popularity curve over 145 years, in five-year steps — the shape of the line, not the size.
- Arleanpeak 1918
- Rethapeak 1924
- Jesusapeak 1924
- Arvellapeak 1926
- Delmapeak 1926
- Trulapeak 1923
- Almetapeak 1924
- Ceolapeak 1924
What this page does not tell you. The Social Security data records how many babies were given a name, not what the name means or where it comes from — so neither do we. Counts cover people with a Social Security number; names given to fewer than five babies in a year are withheld. More on the data.